They’ve leaked terabytes of Russian emails, but who’s reading?

The city of Blagoveshchensk sits in the far east of Russia, some 3,500 miles from Moscow and further still from Kyiv. Across a river, the Chinese city of Heihe sprawls to the south, joined by the first Sino-Russian road bridge; beside the bridge, there’s little about the city to make the news.

But the public affairs of the city are now laid bare for anyone willing to look in the form of 150GB of emails from the Blagoveshchensk City Administration published online by the transparency collective Distributed Denial of Secrets — just one of many data sets leaked to the organization since the invasion of Ukraine began.

As the war in Ukraine approaches the 60-day mark, leaks from the country have been coming at an unprecedented rate. On April 20th, DDoSecrets co-founder Emma Best tweeted that the collective has published 5.8 terabytes of leaks since the invasion started, with no signs of slowing down.

On the day of that tweet, DDoSecrets published two new leaked email caches: 575,000 emails from property management company Sawatzky and 250,000 emails from Worldwide Invest, a Moscow-based investment firm.

In the “Russia” category, the leaks now include a huge cross-section of Russian society, including banks, oil and gas companies, and the Russian Orthodox Church. Relative to some of the other leaked content sourced by DDoSecrets, the Blagoveshchensk emails represent only a mid-sized leak. The smallest data set (a list of the personal details for 120,000 Russian soldiers in Ukraine) is a mere 22MB while the largest (20 years of emails from a Russian state-owned broadcaster) is a whopping 786GB.

DDoSecrets is not the only place to host leaks coming out of Russia, but it is now indisputably the most active — even though DDoSecrets member Lorax Horne says the organization isn’t explicitly trying to publish information that is pro-Ukraine or anti-Russia.

“For folks who haven’t heard of DDoSecrets before last month, they can be forgiven for assuming we’ve taken a position,” Horne told The Verge. “But really it has to do with the data we receive. If we were getting datasets from the other side, we would also consider that for publication. It just so happens that the majority of the datasets that are coming out are related to Russian entities.”

Still, it’s hard to deny that many of DDoSecret’s leaks are motivated by antiwar sentiment. (In an interview with NBC News, Emma Best described hacktivists who leak to the collective as “screaming in response to the injustice of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the inhumanity of the war crimes committed by the invaders.”) The call for hacktivism that came from the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine also helped, Horne says, directing energy toward a defined set of Russian targets. Besides the moral clarity that comes with direction from the Ukrainian government, other experts point toward a hands-off approach from actors who might otherwise curtail hacking activity.

The organization has been labeled as a successor to WikiLeaks, the pioneering leak-sharing platform that seems to have slowly fallen into disarray in the years since founder Julian Assange’s arrest. As the conflict began, almost all of the site’s channels for submitting documents were found to be inoperative, making it all but impossible to share leaks with the original transparency platform and meaning that WikiLeaks has played little role in hosting data related to the Ukraine conflict.

That has given DDoSecrets a newly strategic role, operating as a de facto front-end distribution system for the fruits of hacktivist activity against Russia.

“Traditional hackers were never looked upon fondly from law enforcement or members of the security community, but it seems they have received a free pass in the current conflict to attack all things Russian,” said Jeremiah Fowler, a security researcher who has published research on hacktivism in Ukraine. “Russia has become Anonymous’s biggest recruiter.”

Yet, while the more chronically online among us might long for a world where sharing data can turn the tide of a war, it’s not clear that this is the world we live in.

The leaked data would be most impactful if ordinary Russians had access to it and could browse through the archives for concrete evidence of the elite corruption that is still endemic to the country. But with the information environment in the country being ever more tightly controlled by government censorship, it is unlikely that the vast majority of the leaked information will ever receive mainstream attention domestically.

Bret Schafer, head of the information manipulation research team at the Alliance for Securing Democracy, points to the steady suppression of independent media in Russia as a likely factor in limiting the impact of any incriminating information contained in the recent leaks.

“Using the Pandora Papers as an example, they pointed to clear corruption at very high levels within the Kremlin and it didn’t even really create a ripple domestically in Russia because it wasn’t covered,” Schafer says. “You know, it was covered by a few independent outlets that now no longer exist. So even the limited impact that had domestically probably won’t happen this time around, because independent media has been stifled even further.”

Schafer also points to the crackdown on internet freedom in Russia, exemplified by the blocking of Twitter and Facebook within the country since the invasion began. Though some younger, digitally savvy Russians might be able to circumvent some of these measures, the upshot is that even digital news is increasingly Kremlin-approved.

Long term, changing the Russian public’s understanding of the nature of the invasion will be a prerequisite for bringing the country back into the international order, whether this takes place years or even decades into the future. Leak sites could play some role in this, but so will diplomacy and other measures to support the eventual rebuilding of an independent media.

Whatever the end is here, we can’t kind of come out the other side with 70 percent of Russians thinking that this war was, well, not a war,” Schafer says.

Repost: Original Source and Author Link

Tech News

Chrome 89 brings new Profiles, Reading list, better PWA support

Web browsers have been doing more than just displaying web pages for years. To some extent, they have even become operating systems of their own, especially with advancements in Web technologies. They have become complex, sophisticated, and multi-user, which in turn requires even more work to prevent overwhelming users. In Chrome 89, Google is adding more features to the world’s most-used browser while also giving ways for users to stay sane.

Some PCs at home are used by more than one person, especially these days where work and school have moved indoors. Chrome has long had support for different users but the implementation has been rather crude and basic. In the latest version of Chrome, user profiles can choose their own theme color to easily differentiate one from another while also keeping browsing data like history, passwords, and bookmarks cleanly separated.

Tabs have also been in dire need of some control but there’s no escaping the fact that people love to have dozens of tabs open. It’s easy to get lost in a sea of tabs and also a waste of time going through them one by one. Thankfully, Tab Search is also coming to Chrome 89 after spending some time being exclusive to Chrome OS last year.

Although it’s actually late to the party, Chrome is starting to become an all-in-one web reading solution. The new Reading List, accessible through the same bookmarks system the browser has long offered, lets you collect a temporary of pages to revisit later while keeping them distinct from more permanent bookmarks. The available features so far seem very basic but it could very well be enough for some users who find services like Pocket, Feedly, and the like to be too much.

Chrome 89 also brings technologies like Web HID and Web NFC to stable releases. While those might not sound interesting for end users, they do enable a wider range of experiences that go beyond just browsing, like supporting additional input devices for games and web apps. In addition to new PWA requirements, this release primes Chrome to become an even better platform for creating and distributing those Progressive Web Apps.

Repost: Original Source and Author Link

Tech News

Out of the loop about GameStop? Here’s a handy reading list

GameStop. It’s everywhere: your family members have messaged you about this, the world’s richest man has tweeted memes about this, and there’s also a sea shanty about it.

I don’t blame you if you feel left out of the conversation. However, this piece is not a long-form explainer to explain every character arc in this story. But it’s a collection of well-written articles that can educate you about the issue in a better way.

 Before we begin the GameStop saga, however, it’s important to learn one concept that’s central to the whole story: shorting.


A vague definition of shorting is betting against a company in the share market. Shorters borrow a company’s stock from someone, sell it to another investor, and wait for that stock’s price to go down. Then the shorter will buy them back for a lesser amount, return these stocks to borrowers, and keep the difference.

For example, a Shorter might borrow 50 shares of XYZ and sell them for $300. Now, they’ll wait for the company to fail and share prices to go down. Once the prices are around $200, they’ll buy it back, and keep the $100 per share difference. The video below explains it well.

Now that short selling is out of the way, let’s see what happened with GameStop.

GameStop history

GameStop was known — and probably still is — as a troubled company. Its share prices hovered around $3-$4 last year. In August, pet ecommerce company’s co-founder Ryan Cohen bought 10% shares of GameStop, and brought two colleagues on the board. Later in the year, Cohen said that the firm is going to have a more digital approach and shut down a lot of its physical locations. 

This new strategy excited investors and some new retail investors also bought shares on apps like Robinhood, cause the price to shoot up. This meant people who shorted GameStop had to act quickly. Instead of selling these stocks, some of them borrowed more. And the frenzy started. You can read this in detail on Ars Technica.

Then there was Reddit

r/WallStreetBets is a wild place. Stocks are memes there and it might be a misleading place for someone who doesn’t have a lot of know-how of the market. As Vice notes, it’s “a subreddit filled with chaotic investment advice and surreal memes.” 

Members of that subreddit, started to buy and hype the stock up saying that it’s undervalued. One of the motives was to cause losses to short selling investment firms.

Then other investors from YouTube and TikTok joined in and created a “short squeeze” to increase the GameStop stock price. It’s been a roller coaster ride for this stock, which has gone as high as $469 and as low as $132 in one week.


The Verge has a video on this topic explaining how trading became a favorite activity of many people during the pandemic, and how we arrived at GameStock.

What is happening right now?

This story is continuously developing and we’ll try and update this piece with more information as we unfold more stuff. I’ll leave you with this.

Published January 29, 2021 — 09:21 UTC

Repost: Original Source and Author Link